| |
Having a vision of the way ahead is
fundamental.
– Deborah Warner
The director who cannot collaborate
with his (or her!) actors has mistaken his (or her) vocation.
– Harley Granville-Barker
Young directors simply must from time
to time be hired by a theatrical institution, if only to correct
its inevitable tendency to fossilize.
– Tyrone Guthrie
|
|
|
The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare
Overview

I directed Shrew at the North
Shore Music Theatre in Beverly, Massachusetts in late February/early March
2003; the final performance
was March 21, 2003. The
production featured Ryan Shively as Petruchio and Beth Bailey as Kate. The
design team included Tal Sanders (Set), David R. Zyla (Costumes), Marty
Vreeland (Lights) and John Stone (Sound).
Because the production was primarily for student audiences, there
was no press.
top
of page
Program
Notes

"It's down to me, yes it is
The way she does just what she's told
Down to me, the change has come
She's under my thumb
Ah, ah, say it's alright." |
"I will be kind, won't be so cruel,
I will be sweet, I will be true,
Because of you, a brand new start,
Because of you, a change of heart,
I got a brand new set of rules –
It's just like I was back in school
I've got a brand new set of rules I've got to learn." |
Mick Jagger wrote the first set of lyrics in the mid-1960s,
and the second set in early 2001. In these career-spanning songs, Jagger
demonstrates
the bipolar complexity of our ongoing relationship with the shifting
and inequitable balance of power between the sexes. To dismiss The
Taming of the Shrew as a sexist and patriarchal story from a distant
time is to miss both the fun and the point. Shakespeare is rarely an
advocate for a particular position; far more often, his plays hold
up an attitude or an idea for consideration, and then explore that
idea from as many perspectives as the main story and the subplots can
accommodate, like holding a multi-faceted crystal up to the light.
In her introduction to the New Cambridge edition of The Taming
of the Shrew, editor Anne Thompson concludes, "The real problem lies
outside the play in the fact that the subjection of women to men, although
patently unfair and unjustifiable, is still virtually universal. It
is the world which offends us, not Shakespeare."
These characters
are not precisely who we often think they are; these plays have become
so embedded in our popular culture that we have in
some ways adopted shorthand emblems for characters such as Hamlet (inevitably
stuck with Yorrick's skull in his hand), Lady Macbeth, Juliet and even
Kate the Shrew. Shakespeare scholar Harold Goddard wrote in 1951: "It
is Shrew that is possibly the most striking example among [Shakespeare's]
early works of his love of so contriving a play that it should mean,
to those who might choose to take it so, the precise opposite of what
he knew it would mean to the multitude. " Listen to what
Kate says and doesn't say. Listen to what is said about her. Watch
Petruchio's behaviour and listen to his words. Then ask again, just
who exactly is the shrew here?
Shrew is just as likely to mock
the male proclivity to control female behaviour as it is to endorse
male domination. The moment of Kate's
capitulation to Petruchio's will, when she agrees, "Be it moon,
or sun, or what you please. / And if you please to call it a rush-candle,
/ Henceforth I vow it shall be so for me" (IV, v), undermines
the myth of male domination through its requirement of female complicity.
Petruchio no more believes that Kate actually sees the moon instead
of the sun than he believes it himself; Coppelía Kahn perceives
that Petruchio can take Kate's playful mockery for compromise. In her
last speech, Kate reminds Petruchio that a woman owes her husband the
duty that a subject owes a prince: that is, obedience "to his
honest will" (V, ii). If he becomes tyrannical, we rebel or revolt
against an unfit leader, and so may one partner in a relationship rebel
against an arbitrary other. Before you give free rein to righteous
indignation at the sight of a woman placing her hand beneath her husband's
foot, I encourage you to consider: why shouldn't one offer that kind
of commitment and trust to one's lover, partner, or husband? Of course
this gift must be freely given and should ideally be a circle of exchange,
one to the other and back again, but perhaps that is the site for indignation,
and not that Kate comes to better understand herself, her universe
and finds a way to make the offer.
For additional insights into my approach
to the story, please read my essay, "Talking Amiss of Her" Speech,
Silence and Shrewishness in The Taming of the Shrew.
top
of page
Reviews

Jon Kimbell, Executive Producer, North Shore Music Theatre:
"The production is beautifully designed, a pleasure
to watch, clear as can be, and wonderfully funny. It is the only Shrew I
have seen that emotionally involves me with the characters... we watch Kate
and Petruchio fall in love and negotiate a relationship we know will last.
All the characters are beautifully drawn and true to the text... no small
accomplishment."
top
of page
|
|
 |